Coalition Splits Over Torah Study Basic Law

"More Questions Than Answers"

The Knesset's legal advisor delivered a withering assessment of the proposed legislation, warning lawmakers they are advancing a constitutional amendment whose practical implications remain dangerously unclear.

"There are more questions than answers," declared Knesset Legal Advisor Sagit Afik during Wednesday's committee session. She urged legislators to clarify whether they intend the law to be purely declarative or to carry binding legal weight. Afik warned that the bill could impact a wide range of government ministries' responsibilities, yet the committee has not completed a thorough examination of those consequences.

The legal advisor specifically criticized the absence of relevant IDF representatives from the discussions, stating flatly that the committee cannot conclude deliberations on draft-related legislation without hearing the military's position. Her concerns echoed warnings from Deputy Attorney General Avital Sompolinsky, who told the committee that the bill's sponsors appear to envision a broader constitutional status for Torah scholars than a merely symbolic declaration would provide.

MK Yinon Azoulay of Shas rejected claims that the law carries budgetary implications, arguing its purpose is to provide judges with an additional constitutional tool when adjudicating cases involving Torah study and equality.

But legal experts remain unconvinced, noting that the legislation passed its first reading with explicit warnings that it could prioritize religious study over military service in future constitutional conflicts.

Likud-Degel HaTorah Tensions Explode

The legislative maneuvering unfolded against a backdrop of escalating tensions between Likud and United Torah Judaism's Degel HaTorah faction over both the bill's wording and the broader legislative agenda affecting the ultra-Orthodox community.

Katz's announcement that Likud may file reservations came after reports indicated Degel HaTorah refuses to accept any modifications to the bill's current text. "I see reports about various positions, even though I was told different things yesterday," Katz stated pointedly during the committee session. "We in Likud will also consider filing reservations."

The friction extends beyond this single piece of legislation. United Torah Judaism has threatened to withhold support for coalition bills in the Knesset plenum until the government advances the ultra-Orthodox legislative agenda more aggressively. That threat materialized recently when UTJ members abstained on a vote transferring Interior Ministry powers to Netanyahu — a symbolic but stinging rebuke.

The coalition crisis reflects broader strains within Netanyahu's government. Likud MKs Dan Illouz and Ofir Katz engaged in a heated public confrontation this week over draft legislation, with Illouz accusing Katz of abandoning core party values. Meanwhile, veteran Likud figure Yuli Edelstein announced his departure from the party to launch an independent political movement, triggering what observers describe as significant concern within Netanyahu's inner circle about the erosion of Likud's centrist wing.