Skip to main content
Get our mobile app
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Pentagon Warning

U.S. Commanders Warn on Iran Operations

Classified assessments from Army, Navy and Air Force leaders caution that extended Middle East deployments threaten readiness for other global threats and homeland defense

Pete Hegseth

Senior commanders across the U.S. military have submitted a classified and unusually blunt assessment to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, warning that continuing large-scale operations against Iran at current levels is unsustainable and threatens the military's ability to respond to crises in other regions, including defending the American homeland.

The warnings appear in the Chairman's Risk Assessment, a document that summarizes the readiness and availability of U.S. forces worldwide. The August 14, 2026 edition includes formal positions from the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force, alongside four-star commanders overseeing operations in Europe, Asia and Latin America.

As President Donald Trump continues pressing Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and agree to terms ending the conflict, he has insisted all options remain on the table. Consequently, U.S. Central Command maintains more than 50,000 troops on standby in the Middle East in case further strikes are required.

The assessment directs some deployed forces to remain until September, while others are slated to stay through 2027. The prospect of further extensions prompted commanders to voice concerns in an extraordinary manner. Leaders of European Command, Indo-Pacific Command, Southern Command and the Chief of Naval Operations all formally registered disagreement with the directive, while clarifying they would execute it.

US Secretary of Defense | THAAD Interceptor Stockpiles
US Secretary of Defense | THAAD Interceptor Stockpiles (Shutterstock )

Commanders of European Command and Southern Command told Hegseth that transferring ships and intelligence-gathering aircraft to Central Command has compromised their ability to fulfill homeland defense obligations. Indo-Pacific Command chief Admiral Samuel Paparo formally disagreed with the sustained support level required from his command, including a carrier strike group and destroyers.

Admiral Daryl Caudle, Chief of Naval Operations, presented the starkest picture in the assessment. He argued the Navy cannot sustain current support levels without a projected end date. The service has been required to provide dozens of vessels for the campaign, first for strikes and defense, then to enforce a blockade on Iranian ports.

Caudle noted that only about a quarter of the military's destroyer fleet is currently ready for deployment, a sharp decline from pre-war readiness levels. The document states that the impact on ship maintenance jeopardizes fleet availability in case of additional conflicts. Speaking at an event in Norfolk, Caudle said, "I'm generally not a big fan of extensions, and I push back hard against them, but the enemy gets a vote."

Force depletion and ammunition shortages

The 82nd Airborne Division, which deployed 2,000 troops in March, will remain in the Middle East at least until September, with expectations of further extension. Deployments of units operating Patriot air defense systems are also expected to expand, while interceptor depletion limits the administration's ability to escalate the fighting.

The war has depleted stocks of THAAD interceptors and Tomahawk missiles, alongside the loss of approximately 25 percent of the Pentagon's Reaper drone fleet and billions of dollars in damage to regional bases. The administration continues to maintain that reports of ammunition shortages are inaccurate.

Numerous Air Force units sent to the Middle East for strike missions and round-the-clock operations are scheduled to remain in the region into 2027. These formal disagreements join earlier warnings from commanders, including General Dan Cain, who cautioned before fighting began about insufficient ammunition availability.

Spokesman Sean Parnell responded that "decisions regarding the scope and duration of specific force commitments to each combatant command are made based on the current threat assessment, strategic priorities set by the President, and the advice of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and combatant commanders." He added that the Pentagon "does not discuss internal operational processes" or concur and non-concur positions given during force allocation deliberations.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes (0)
No (0)
Follow Us:

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest