'If You Will' Joins the Argument

Friend of the Court: 'If You Will' filed a petition to join the hearing

After submitting the petition to the High Court against the reduction of the Clause of Reasonability and the joining of many protest organizations to the petition, the 'If You Will' movement submitted a request to join the hearing as a 'friend of the court'

(Photo: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

After submitting an appeal against the law to reduce the Clause of Reasonability and with the joining of numerous protest organizations to the appeal, today (Sunday), the 'If You Will' movement appealed to the Supreme Court requesting to join the discussion as a 'friend of the court'. This request marks the first time that a civil society organization from the nationalist camp has sought to join the discussion.

The main purpose of the institution 'Friend of the Court' is to assist the court in a certain matter by someone who is not a direct party to the ongoing dispute. Israeli jurisprudence recognizes the authority of the court to include an individual or entity as a 'Friend of the Court'. According to the claim of the 'If You Will' movement, filed by attorneys Eran Ben-Ari, Assaf Techelet, and Eitan Marans, the court has no jurisdiction to deliberate on the constitutionality of basic laws, therefore the appeal should be rejected.

The main arguments accompanying the request for participation are detailed and encompass numerous references to legislation, rulings, and studies from both within the country and internationally. The elaboration includes addressing all attempts by the petitioners to identify an authoritative source (which doesn't exist) that would grant the court the power to invalidate, for the first time in the history of the state, basic laws.

According to the movement's stance, accepting the petition will strip the democratic foundation from the definition of the state and will shift the center of decision-making authority in Israeli society from the public and its elected representatives to an unelected court, thereby limiting the people's ability to shape their own lives.

From the law firm representing the "If You Will" movement, it was conveyed: "These are fateful petitions that will decide whether in the State of Israel the people are sovereign, as in all democratic states, or not. After the court allowed many left-wing organizations to argue that it is authorized, for the first time in the country's history, to annul a fundamental law, a vital law, it is crucial that the voice of the national civil society be heard. Our detailed and well-articulated position is unequivocal: the court has no source of authority to adjudicate the petitions, and it should reject them immediately."

0 Comments

Do not send comments that include inflammatory words, defamation, and content that exceeds the limit of good taste.

Israel Police, Drugs

Israel Police Negev Borders Unit Seizes Dozens of Kilos of Cocaine Near Egyptian Border

The suspect carrying the drugs was a resident of the Bedouin town of Bir Hadaj.

Avi Woolf | 11.02.24

Israel Police, Counterfeit Money

Tens of Thousands of Counterfeit Shekels Seized by Police

The Police found the money when a motorcycle was moving suspiciously and called on it to stop.

Avi Woolf | 08.02.24

"There is Authority"

The representative of the Attorney General's office reconsiders: There is authority to declare incapacity

Representative of the Attorney General's Office, Aner Helman: It's impossible to rule out all possibilities in advance, so one cannot say that a conflict of interests in criminal matters cannot lead to the Prime Minister's incapacitation. We shouldn't let them say that it's impossible to declare the Prime Minister incapable due to a conflict of interests

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 28.09.23

A Change in the Composition of the Judges

Because of the postponement of the date: a change in the composition of the judges who will hear the petition against Yariv Levin

After the Supreme Court received the position of Justice Minister Yariv Levin, a date was set for the hearing against him regarding the Judicial Appointments Committee. The new composition of the committee is considered to be more "conservative"

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 20.09.23

Likud Publishes a Clarification Notice

After Netanyahu's words: Likud issues a clarification statement

Likud publishes a clarification notice following Netanyahu's words about the legal reform: "He did not reject the legal reform at all"

Guy Ezra, JFeed Staff | 19.09.23

The Discussion on the Clause of Reasonability

After 13 hours: the discussion on the Clause of Reasonability ended

After 13.5 hours, the discussion in the Supreme Court regarding the law to limit the Clause of Reasonability has concluded. Now, everyone is waiting for the judgment, which will be delivered in the coming months. The Knesset and the government were given 21 days to complete their written arguments

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 12.09.23

The Dramatic Discussion

The debate continues: "The government can harm democracy"

Historically, all 15 judges of the High Court gathered for a dramatic discussion on the question of whether to invalidate the "Basic Law: The Judiciary" amendment, regarding the reduction of the Clause of Reasonability. Watch the live broadcast

JFeed | 12.09.23

The Legal Reform

In the face of interference from the judges Rothman: "The people are the sovereign"

In the face of interference from the judges, the Chairman of the Constitution Committee, Simcha Rothman, demanded to reject the petitions against the Basic Law, "Don't try to take away the people of Israel's democracy and their trust in democracy."

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 12.09.23

The Legal Reform

Watch the live broadcast: the High Court discusses the cancellation of the probable cause law

Historically, all 15 judges of the High Court gathered for a dramatic discussion on the question of whether to invalidate the "Basic Law: The Judiciary" amendment, regarding the reduction of the reason for reasonableness. Watch the live broadcast

JFeed | 12.09.23

The Legal Reform

Before the dramatic hearing at the High Court: Yariv Levin made an harsh statement

Before the dramatic discussion on the reduction of the reason for reasonableness, Justice Minister Yariv Levin launched a sharp attack against the judges of the High Court: "a fatal injury to democracy and to the status of the Knesset"

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 12.09.23

Smotrich Sets a Red Line

The contacts for compromise: Smotrich sets a red line for agreements

Minister Smotrich referred to the discussions at the President's Residence and the reports about a compromise plan that Netanyahu is promoting for the judicial reform. Smotrich clarified, "Under no circumstances will we agree to give up the diversity in the selection of judges"

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 11.09.23

The Judicial Reform

Gantz rejects the compromise: "There is no one to talk to at this time"

Leader of the Blue and White party, Benny Gantz, releases statement to the media addressing, for the first time, reports regarding a compromise proposal on judicial reform

Bentzi Rubin, JFeed Staff | 05.09.23