Why does The NYT Write About Jews and Dogs?

Humans naturally gravitate toward ideologies that do not demand their own blood. This is why the white Marxist elites in the West support all kinds of bloody struggles, in whose name the blood of the oppressed of every race in the world is spilled, except their own.

In a Freudian sense, the article published in The New York Times a week ago was designed to do something very peculiar to the Jews: to exclude them from the human family. The claim that dogs were trained to rape Palestinians was intended to sever the human connection between master and slave, between abuser and victim. Even this connection, which was preserved through all the genuine horrors in human history, was meant to be severed here.

The Jews, if they could not invent robots to inflict abuse, were forced at the very least to engineer some laboratory dog to act as their agent of torment. In other words, they are so utterly subhuman that even their sadism must be outsourced to a third party.

Furthermore, the claim regarding dogs is even more bizarre: a dog is supposed to be man’s best friend. Your relationship with a dog reflects your relationship with the world; it is a mirror of your relationship with nature itself. The idea that Jews possess such a sexual, pathological relationship with dogs is meant to explain to us that the Jews are, in fact, profoundly sick.

One of the reasons The New York Times has reached a point where it must publish such delusional things is that Jews today possess actual power. Not imagined power, but real, tangible power: airplanes, ships, missiles, bombs, soldiers. This power forces blood libels to assume highly bizarre dimensions.

Thus, we encounter a paradox. In ancient times, when Jews possessed no actual physical or political power, it was necessary to fabricate wild tales about ritualistic acts performed behind the scenes, despite their lack of tangible strength. But now that they possess real power, and one must confront face-to-face the reality captured on camera in global conflicts, where everything is actually transparent and known, it becomes necessary once again to escape into the realms of fantasy. It must be imagined that the transparent, stark, and real power of the Jews is not brute, standard force, but is, of course, inherently demonic.

The truth is that the world has been conditioned to believe anything when it comes to the Jews. In fact, the Jews themselves serve as a sort of exercise in mental acrobatics: you can state anything, append the word "Jew," and if you can conceive that a Jew did it, you can believe it to be true.

Therefore, this is yet another attempt to restore the Jew to that metaphysical, demonic, dark, and insane space through which the fantasies of hatred can be ignited and fueled. Now, the only question remains: why?

Perhaps because the author’s father was a Nazi.