Blood plot: In the right-wing, they do not support murder, they just want a fair trial

Is a demand for a fair trial and a claim that a confession obtained under severe torture is questionable, a support for murder? Is a claim that the real killer may be walking around free and an innocent person is sitting in harsh conditions in prison, a support for a terrorist? Or is this another whim of the left to attack the right and it's all from a position again?

"Ben Uliel knew the details" is it true?

So after it was made clear that despite the new blood plot attempt, there is no one who supports family murder, let's get down to the details. Many of the claims against the demand for a fair trial is that "Amiram knew in the reconstruction of the murder certain details that the investigators did not know." So I'm just asking, are the investigators who severely tortured Ben Uliel just to get him to confess to the act maybe not telling the truth? After all, the court also invalidated some of the confessions obtained under torture, which further undermines the credibility of the investigators. So why is it illegitimate to demand a more thorough investigation to find out the truth and check the version of the researchers whose credibility is in doubt?

If we go into the details of the case, there are quite a few gaps and puzzling things. In addition to admitting that the credibility under torture in my eyes is questionable. For example, taking testimony from an eyewitness but omitting additional details he gave and not getting along with Ben Uliel's reconstruction. After all, his entire reconstruction was based on the fact that he was alone and the eyewitness commented that he saw 2 suspects. Or his participation in the reconstruction of the senior investigator, 'Miguel' contrary to proper procedure. (These are just 2 examples out of a number of gaps created in the reconstruction and investigation. I recommend everyone to delve into the published facts and details and express their opinion).

If you are so sure of conviction, why are you so afraid of a retrial?

I am not a lawyer, but as mentioned, from a small and in-depth reading of the facts on the ground, one can see the problematic nature of the confession, the investigation and the trial. And to those who disagree so much and are sure that everything went well, why are you so opposed to a retrial and finding out the truth? After all, if you are so sure that Ben Uliel is the murderer, what is the fuss about? They will investigate the problematic details and find out that you were right.

If the Shin Bet investigators are indeed telling the truth and the investigation was conducted with integrity and flawlessly, why does the organization make such an effort to send its spokesmen and mouthpieces to all the television studios in order to attack any public figure who dares to express criticism and offer a fair trial? What are they so afraid of?