Skip to main content
Get our mobile app
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Analysis

Eisenkot lost ability to form government

Nadav Eyal lays out scenario in which Netanyahu and Liberman join forces after change bloc fails to assemble coalition, leaving 60-60 split

Gadi Eisenkot

Senior Israeli political analyst Nadav Eyal has published a bleak assessment for the anti-Netanyahu camp, arguing that Gadi Eisenkot, head of the Yashar party, currently has no stable path to forming a minority government.

Eyal breaks down the arithmetic: "Netanyahu's 53 plus Liberman's 7 will vote actively against," he explains. The only way around that wall would be if United Torah Judaism agrees to abstain while Liberman votes no, which "sounds difficult," Eyal writes and even then, Eisenkot would still need to rely on the Arab parties. "Likely to be hard for Bennett," he adds.

The nightmare scenario: how Netanyahu and Liberman could join hands

What remains on paper, according to Eyal, is a government built on the chareidim, the change bloc and Liberman together. But that is where what he calls the change bloc's "nightmare scenario" kicks in.

Eyal lays out the chain of events that makes this scenario both complicated and dangerous for Netanyahu's opponents:

A government like that cannot be formed because Shas and Aryeh Deri will not actually allow it. Along the way, Liberman drags everyone into turning their backs on proposals for universal conscription or sanctions.

As a result, Eisenkot fails to assemble a coalition within the time available to him, and the mandate returns to President Herzog.

At that point, Netanyahu receives the mandate from the president and offers Liberman a rotation. Liberman believes he can impose those terms and even secure them, including re-entry into Likud institutions. "He's not Benny Gantz, he'll go for it," Eyal estimates.

The map reaches a 60-60 split, and only one more MK from the change bloc is needed to form a Netanyahu-Liberman government.

"On conscription they already agree"

A source involved in the details was quoted in Eyal's column as saying: "On conscription they already agree; all that remains is the personal matter and the end of Netanyahu's tenure."

Still, Eyal adds several major caveats to this scenario. First, Liberman continues to say that Netanyahu must not serve as prime minister. Second, in his assessment it will not be easy to recruit the additional MK from the opposing bloc, because "this is not the era of the Silmans in the change camp."

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes
No
Follow Us:

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest