Skip to main content
Get our mobile app
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Israeli Politics

Opposition rhetoric "dangerous" — analyst

Shirit Avitan-Cohen warns that Eisenkot and Liberman are waging a delegitimization campaign against the government's authority to make security decisions

Political Analyst: Opposition's Security Rhetoric is Dramatic and Dangerous

Political analyst Shirit Avitan-Cohen told Galei Yisrael radio on Thursday that she is deeply concerned by recent statements from senior opposition figures regarding Israel's security policy. In her remarks, Avitan-Cohen accused Gadi Eisenkot and Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Liberman of deliberately attempting to undermine the government's legitimacy to make security decisions.

She believes that the political moves being taken in recent days go beyond legitimate political criticism and represent a particularly worrying phenomenon. "Something much more dramatic and dangerous is happening here, and I'm really troubled by it," the analyst said on air. She first pointed an accusing finger at Eisenkot, claiming he is leading an effort designed to erode the authority of the political echelon: "The story of Gadi Eisenkot starting a delegitimization campaign against the government's ability to manage the state's security affairs."

"Using it like a campaign - and the election is over"

Continuing her remarks, Avitan-Cohen pointed to what she described as a growing trend within the opposition, and addressed statements made this morning by Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Liberman. According to her, Liberman is joining the same line of action and attempting to present gaps between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the security establishment in order to limit the government's room for maneuver.

"It continues this morning with Liberman, who is playing exactly the same line and hinting at disagreements between Netanyahu and Zamir, and saying that Netanyahu can only act if all the security branches see eye to eye with him," Avitan-Cohen noted.

Summing up her remarks, the political analyst emphasized that the attempt to constrain the government's steps in the security arena endangers the state, and that the political system must internalize that the confrontations of the election campaign are behind them. "They're starting to reduce the government's ability to manage, to protect the security of its citizens. This is a frightening event. This is an event they're using like a campaign, and the election is over. And that's very dangerous," she concluded.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes
No
Follow Us:

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest