Skip to main content

״This Is a Marshall Plan for Iran"

John Kerry: Trump's Iran Deal Makes Obama's Look Like Pocket Change

John Kerry compared Trump's $300B Iran reconstruction fund to a Marshall Plan, defending the Obama deal's concrete nuclear limits against what he called a capitulation.

John Kerry

John Kerry, the former Secretary of State who spent years negotiating the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, has emerged as one of the sharpest critics of the Trump administration's new MOU framework, and he is not holding back.

In a series of media appearances, Kerry drew stark contrasts between what the Obama administration extracted from Iran and what the Trump deal has offered, framing the new agreement as a diplomatic capitulation dressed up as a victory.

On the $300 billion reconstruction fund at the heart of the MOU, Kerry was blunt. "That's what he is talking about using to rebuild Iran. Evidently we're going to have a Marshall Plan for Iran instead of for a lot of other countries that need it." He put the number in perspective: "The money that was in our agreement was about $1.78 billion. What he's talking about giving Iranians is $300 billion."

Kerry also pushed back on the recurring conservative claim that the Obama administration handed Iran American taxpayer money. "The money that we gave them was their money, not ours," he said. "It came from a deal for weapons back in the 1970s when the Shah was still there."

On the nuclear restrictions his team negotiated, Kerry argued that the 2015 JCPOA accomplished concrete, verifiable results that the new deal has so far not approached. "We destroyed a plutonium reactor that they were about two weeks from bringing online. We filled the calandria of that weapon with cement. Could never be used again. We had cradle-to-grave restrictions on uranium, 130 additional inspectors put on the ground in Iran looking every single day, inspecting at will."

Ready for more?

Kerry also offered an underappreciated defense of Iran's then-Supreme Leader, noting that Khamenei took real political risks to allow the 2015 negotiations to proceed. "The people who opposed getting an agreement told the Ayatollah, 'If you negotiate with the Great Satan, you will regret it.' He took political flak for that internally."

In a separate MSNBC appearance, Kerry described the Trump MOU as "basically an agreement that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened," arguing that Trump's war had "undone his own presidency" and damaged US credibility abroad.

Kerry's critique lands amid a broader bipartisan backlash to the $300 billion reconstruction commitment. Senator Lindsey Graham compared the move to granting a Marshall Plan to Germany "with the Nazis still in charge." Senator Amy Klobuchar wrote: "With $300 billion, we could end homelessness, fund cancer research for 40 years, and give every child free pre-K for over 7 years. Instead, Trump is sending it to Iran."

Trump and Vance have insisted that no American taxpayer funds will go to Iran, with Vance saying "not a cent of American money goes to Iran" and Trump calling the $300 billion figure "Fake News." The MOU text, however, commits the US to facilitating the fund through sanctions waivers and financial permissions, leaving the ultimate source of the money to be negotiated over the next 60 days.

For Kerry, the bottom line is simple: the man who spent years calling his deal the worst in American history just signed something far more generous, with far less in return.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes (11)
No (0)
Follow Us:

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest