Why Democrats Claim Trump's Insane

The world has a new God, Church, and clergy. And with it, a new way to burn or treat heretics.

"Sinner" is too unserious, "insane" shall do, especially with a political foe.

Those Yale Democrats who now claim Donald Trump has lost his sanity, aren't offering a diagnosis; but only a glimpse to their own enslaved-self and/or their desire to graduate and become slave masters.

Spinoza knew, that to define freedom through the lens of an external phenomena, (such as arbitrary social conventions) is actually the definition of enslavement.

Hence why the "sanity" argument is usually a weapon of those in desperation to maintain a grip on others via a definition of the normative.

What they are basically saying is this:

We all agree that X = Y. We all agree that X is made out of X1, and that Y is made out of Y1. We all agree that you qualify as containing a correlation between X1 and Y1.

We base this on language and agreements we have already discussed with regards to the nature and meaning of X, X1, and Y and Y1, and previous understanding of how these are to be characterized, and what we believe they mean, with regards to yourself from an array of other linguistic non empirical characterizations we have in our arsenal.

I.e This is total BS from any scientific metric.

The "Church of Sanity" is a hybrid of legal and psychological categories that grew into establishments, using "normalcy" the same way feudal lords use the clergy: to keep men in their lane.

Collective-arbitrary "Sanity" has always been the preferred weapon of the European elitists. We saw it in the Soviet Union, where dissidents were thrown into psychiatric wards to rot. We saw it in Israel, where 'Sanity" was used to delegitimize the pioneers of Gush Emunim (whose "messianic" visions often proved more prescient than the "sane" establishment's theories).

Because it stems from a suppressed drive to control, sanity is never a truth; it is basically a tool of enforcement.

Modern psychology, rooted largely in centralized places such as Germany and France, was harnessed by the very same "Leftist Intelligentsia" that seeks to categorize the human soul.

They possess a terrifying hubris, believing they can measure the "heart and kidneys" of a leader based on his refusal to follow their polite, European-style etiquette. One can only imagine what diagnosis they'd hurl at president Andrew Jackson.

These institutions fear the non-normative because stagnant people, in mental paralysis, make better subjects.

They fear the unpredictable and uncategorized individual. Their message to the public is that you are allowed to "rebel" through alcohol, bad music, pornography, or drugs, and shopping. You are NOT allowed to be a powerful, radical, "Übermensch".

And when Bob Dylan wrote the existential truth in 1965 about how "Even the president of the United states must sometimes stand naked", these people are saying in a less poetic way - that he must always be exposed to their categories, unworthy of subjectivity, being X or Y, as he exists in their anti-poetic, controlling, punitive and sick imagination as totally exposed.

Indeed, even the President of the United States is forbidden from breaking the psychological dystopian mold. If he dares to speak outside the pre-approved linguistic boundaries, the "priests" of the clinic immediately move to strip him of his subjectivity and authority.

We are fortunate to have a leader who exposes the fragility of these categories, and to do so with wit and humor. Trump stands before the world and effectively declares that these categories and their establishments no longer hold the power to decide what is real or appropriate.

He reveals the ideological and political bias inherent in America's "therapeutic" establishment. His refusal to bow to the unforgiving dogma of "etiquette", which is simply the modern descendant of royalist manners used to exclude or enslave "common" man, has broken the spell of the psychological elite. This is their murmur of death.

The Classical Liberal Stand

As true classical liberals, we recognize this as a war on the sovereignty of the individual. When the establishment loses the ability to argue on the merits, they attack legitimacy. When they cannot rule the content, they pathologize the aesthetics.

It is time to stop fearing and start questioning the motives of the people holding the clipboard. If being "sane" means being a slave to the conventions of a decaying worldview and a politically morbid mindset, then perhaps it is time for more madness.