Will Trump Deliver on His Threats? Navigating the Ambiguity of American Power

The arrival of the Israeli Prime Minister in Washington appears to signal a certain degree of flexibility within the current American position. It is hardly surprising that the United States is seeking to bend in order to facilitate an agreement. Furthermore, we should not be shocked that this potential American shift comes after Trump encouraged the public to take to the streets without compromise and risk their lives for the cause.

However, observers must be careful not to confuse the American willingness to compromise, retreat from previous positions, or lower the flames with a refusal to attack.

The continuous deployment of American forces to the region serves as a clear indication that military action remains a distinct possibility.

As commentators, we often struggle to distinguish between the personal language Trump utilizes to set threats and the cold, precise technical level at which he executes his moves.

This pattern is repeating itself now. Trump is a master of the "bluff" where the ego is always on the table.

He has a unique talent for performing actions that leave the world wondering if he is entirely devoid of ego or acting purely because of it. This ability to generate total ambiguity is one of his primary strengths.

Therefore, when discussing red lines, it is essential to remember that they are rooted in the Trump doctrine. This includes the ballistic missile project which continues to be a major source of concern for both Israel and the United States.

While the diplomatic theater continues in Washington, the technical preparations in the field suggest a different story. Whether or not someone will actually give the final order to strike remains the ultimate unknown but given the lack of Iranian compromise on multiple fronts - it is starting to appear like the most likely scenario.