Skip to main content
Get our mobile app
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Netanyahu trial

Magal: What happens if Bibi loses

Radio host Yinon Magal says that if Netanyahu loses the election in two weeks and steps down, the trial will end in acquittal: There is no bribery

Yinon Magal

Radio host Yaion Magal of 103fm said this morning (Tuesday) that if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu loses the election in two weeks and steps down, the trial will collapse. "If Netanyahu, chas v'shalom, loses the election and retires, there will unequivocally be an acquittal, and there will be a defence of justice. There is no bribery," Magal said.

His remarks came as former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit completed his second day of testimony in Netanyahu's trial last night.

Defence attorney Amit Hadad presented protocols from two meetings in court: one in which Mandelblit approved the interrogation of Shaul and Iris Elovitch on suspicion of bribing the prime minister, and another in which he approved placing Netanyahu himself under caution for questioning.

Hadad argued that this was the formal approval for the investigation of the prime minister. But Mandelblit clarified that from the quotes about Netanyahu's interrogation, it is clear this was not the first discussion of suspicions against Netanyahu, a preliminary examination process had preceded it, and materials on the matter had already been presented. He also stressed that it was important to him to formulate the caution given to Netanyahu. Hadad asked whether the caution included suspicion of bribery, and Mandelblit replied that to the best of his recollection, a vaguer formulation was used: "offences of breach of trust".

Hadad remarked that caution regarding the offence of bribery was warranted: "The interrogation of the prime minister on suspicion of bribery in Case 4000, which later collapses." Mandelblit corrected him: "You said it collapses."

Following an exchange between prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh and Hadad over the bribery clause, Mandelblit added: "Sorry for interrupting, but all these things stem from your remarks, these are not questions, these are remarks that do not lead to a question."

At this point, Hadad became angry and attacked Mandelblit: "Is this what an attorney general's approval to open an investigation looks like? This is approval?!" The former AG answered: "I accept that, perhaps I should have been more explicit. On the other hand, I now remember I approved interrogating the prime minister under caution."

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes
No
Follow Us:

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest