From Kant to Hitler: The Dark Evolution of Anti-Jewish Thought

If Kant sees ethics as foundational - the Jews cannot be part of the ethical.

If for Hegel the spirit of the world is foundational - the Jews can't be part of it.

if for Marx the Proletariat is foundational - the Jews are its enemy.

These key thinkers of German Idealism turned Jews to be the anti-ideal of their own methods.

And so what we see now in America, is the country losing its Lockean and Jeffersonian essence to German idealism, and as a result consequently its perception of Jews, moves away from Anglo-protestant benevolence, to Germanic-ideal hate."

Hegel explicitly argued that the “Jewish curse” lies in the refusal to unite with the world-spirit and accept the one sent to them (Jesus). 

Therefore, by his logic, the Jews are condemned to remain stuck outside the true unfolding of history - "Forever cowardly slaves to Yahweh" removed from spirit.

Marx then came and claimed: if the Jews are suspended from history and true spirit, they turn that suspension and removal from Geist, rooted in their religion of abstract legalism leading to pure materialism (He took this view from Kant as well), into a tool for exploiting the body which carries history - i.e. the working class. 

The Jews, Marx argued, do so in order to prevent the needed development of the 'Social Man', while subverting the true direction of history as they hold societal control on the material realm (Early Bruno Bauer influence).

Hitler in a sense, accepts the Hegelian Maxim of Jews forever being damned and removed from History and True Spirit, and even the Marxian critique of Jews as a societal degenerate "Anti-Class". 

But he goes further in seeing Marxism in itself, as a pinnacle moment in world history, and in the dialectics of struggle and race.

Because Hitler comes in a post emancipatory time in Germany, he can argue something neither Kant, Hegel nor Marx could argue about the Jews.

He could argue that secular modernity itself, and especially its most concrete and radical form, as manifesting in Marx, has proved itself post emancipation, to be no more than just another Jewish attempt to subvert spirit and race, and even "kidnap" the same Hegelian dialectics which dethroned and exposed the Jew!.

Thus, Marx is despite being an anti-semite is in fact a post-emancipatory Jewish Conspiracy to undermine German Idealism, as a method, and the German race via moving the needle away from race, and focusing it on Capital.

This, by Hitlerism, exposes the world to the inevitable conclusion, there is no social, ideological, political, system that is immune from Jewish otherness. Or Jewish subversion, which leads us to understand that the anti-spiritual and anti-historic schemes of world jewry, made once emancipated, must stem from a nonintellectual core - a racial one.

The true standing of the Jew is not in relation to history (Hegel), matter (Marx), both which the Jew himself can manipulate, but his real demiurgical nature, from ancient times, till today, can only be explained via race - given all other original methods of thoguht could be subverted by him - just as German Idealism was by Marx. 

The Hitlerian reading explains (via circular logic) a few things that previous German Antisemites argued.

1. His original Anti-historic and anti-spiritual being (Hegel).

2. His materialistic nature (Kant and Marx)

3. But also, his ability to "escape" those, and shape-shift between the metaphysical and imminent

4. due to his demiurgic nature stemming from his blood.

5. this explains why Hitler saw sexual relations between Jewish men and German women as especially dangerous, due to his conception of the archetype of the Jews impregnating German blood, which could lead not only to the spoiling of the German blood, but could also infer to the fact that they are by this entering the body of a nation, in a similar way as Jesus entered the world.

And as we all know, by a Nazi reading, Jesus entered the world to take away the power and strength (as a Jewish idea) from the Aryan race, as Jewish subversion, so in the realm of blood, race, and nation does the Jew do when entering the German womb. 

Hitler radicalized the same structure of thought: not only, he said, do the Jews exploit others by remaining outside history (Hegel), they also use their enslavement to Yahweh (Hegel, Kant), to subvert history (Marx), by inventing ideologies that justify their mastery (including, Christianity itself, as well as Marxism and Capitalism) all meant to ensure the survival of the race, and this is done in order to negate the host spirit-body with their "ideas" that are part of a body against competing races.

Hitler represents a biological evolution of Kantian positions regarding the material particularity of the Jewish question, as an antithesis to universality; Hegelian positions of the Jew as anti-spirit and anti-history, who becomes historical and dialectical through Marx, only to position himself post-emancipation as the enemy of the race.

Hence there is no other choice but to induce oneself to see them from a political perspective in a post emancipatory, and post Bolshevic reality, as well as from a Neo-Hegelian and post-Marxian social analysis, as ideological and materialistic parasites that act in accordance with biological characteristics.

Otherwise, no other attempt to save the race and world from their attempts to enslave society through the dethroning of race, society, and spirit in history could be made.

The motion of German history, from reason (Kant) to spirit (Hegel), to Matter (Marx), can only continue if the race persists in purifying the demiurge. 

Therefore, drawing on a proposal already voiced by one of the fathers of German Nationalism, Fichte, the conclusion is that the only solution is to “cut off their heads.” so they cannot shape-shift. the reason? The jew with Hegel must be absorbed into Christianity, but refuses and remains a passive being. With Marx he must be absorbed not only in society, but as a condition for world salvation, with Hitler, we see a return to the mystification of the blood (Catholicism), as an explanation to why post- emancipatory absorption failed, and a new historical struggle focused on the race, must rise.

And so, we see how Woke right will naturally arise in  a historical pattern after Woke left deemed liberalism unworthy.

For once "Jewish questions" are not determined by "world-spirit", or "society" let alone "religion", - all to be exposed to as mechanisms of Jewish impregnation, there must be an ontological element to it which calls us to remove Jewry from our dialectical struggle oriented existence as a whole.

Hitler does to Judaism in modernity precisely what early Catholic Christianity did to it in antiquity. He forwards an ideological structure to find in it a necessity based on the rejection of the Jewish other in order to reach hollism.

Just as Catholicism appropriated the Hebrew Bible while denying the continued legitimacy of the Hebrew people, so Hitler keeps the modern dialectical project, which sees Jews as an Antithesis, in both its materialist (Marx), Universal (Kant) and historical-idealist components (Hegel), yet removes the Jew from it entirely to reach a total new world.

Last but not least - For Hegel, before emancipation, the Jews stand outside spiritual dialectic, yet are still considered eligible for civil equality within the state.

For Marx, during emancipation, the Jews dominate material dialectic, and therefore must be totally absorbed into society in order to complete human liberation.

For Hitler, after emancipation, the Jews are imagined as dominating both the material and the spiritual dialectic - through their blood, and therefore must be eliminated for the struggle of spirit through blood to continue.

Thus, more than it was a matter of racial theories becoming fashionable, it was emancipation itself that provided the excuse for why the world had failed to become either the paradise of the Absolute Spirit or the nation of the proletariat - two visions the Nazi worldview sought to synthesize in order to accelerate the emergence of the Übermensch - embodied in a new race.

Likewise today: far from being merely a renewed obsession with “race” (popular since the Obama era), the core difficulty remains an unwillingness to accept Jewish existence as:inside the historical dialectic (contra Hegel), and exercising influence in the material sphere without dissolving into society (contra Marx), and this leads, once again, toward Hitlerian positions and Hitlerian conclusions as the process of catholicization of America continues.