Skip to main content

"Netanyahu Spoke Nonsense"

Former Military Intelligence Chief Yadlin: "Iran Doesn't Have a Nuclear Bomb"

Former Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin says Israel's security doctrine has been tainted by politics and pushes back on Netanyahu's claim that Iran possessed nuclear weapons.

Pezeshkian

Former IDF Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin sharply challenged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent claims about Iran's nuclear weapons capability, arguing Israel's security doctrine has become tainted by political considerations, in a wide-ranging interview marking 1,000 days since the start of the war that began on October 7.

Speaking to 103FM, Yadlin, now president and founder of the Mind Israel movement, pushed back on Netanyahu's recent assertions that Iran already possessed nuclear bombs. Yadlin said former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had already stated that Netanyahu was speaking nonsense and not telling the truth, suggesting the claim was likely a slip of the tongue. According to Yadlin, Iran did not have nuclear bombs, though it certainly had the capability to break out toward a bomb had it decided to, a process that would have taken a certain amount of time.

Yadlin directed sharp criticism at the strategic management of the campaign, arguing that outside considerations have infiltrated the most sensitive core of Israel's security establishment. He said Israel's security doctrine has become tainted by political considerations, echoing comments made a day earlier by Maj. Gen. (res.) Nitzan Alon, who said Israel could have brought hostages home and ended the war, not through total victory, but through a strategic one.

Yadlin warned that insistence on "total victory" across every front is dragging Israel into a prolonged war of attrition, which he said is precisely the vision of the slain Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. He said multi-front war was Sinwar's vision, and that Sinwar, now sitting in what Yadlin described as hell, can look on with some satisfaction at having succeeded in entangling Israel in something he could not achieve on October 7 itself. Yadlin added that the State of Israel was not built for a war of attrition, and that Israel's security doctrine is based on deterrence, early warning, defense, and strategic decision.

Despite the criticism, Yadlin was clear that the IDF has achieved major accomplishments on the ground and that Israel's security situation is far better than it was on the eve of the disaster. He said anyone who believed there could be total victory on seven fronts was gravely mistaken, but that from a security standpoint, Israel's position is better than it was on October 6, since its enemies have been badly weakened. He said Israel has not fully defeated them, but has strategically decided the conflict against them.

As an example, Yadlin pointed to the dramatic change in Gaza, asking how Hamas looked on October 6 compared to today. He said Hamas today poses no threat to the western Negev, its rockets no longer reach anywhere in Israel, and it is no longer capable of carrying out the kind of devastating damage and massacre it carried out on October 7. He said that if Israel coordinates properly with the United States, it will know how to finish the job.

Yadlin closed by calling on the government to set clear priorities, to close secondary fronts where a decision has already been reached or where no existential threat remains, and to pair military moves with diplomatic ones. He said there is no balanced victory without understanding that strategic victory requires combining military and diplomatic action, something he said is sorely lacking. He said Israel's red lines are clear, that it will not accept an existential threat or terror armies on its borders, but that everywhere else, diplomatic moves need to be pursued to close out the fronts.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes (46)
No (2)
Follow Us:
1

Unmissable content


Loading comments...

Also of Interest