Cenk Uygur Humiliated in Explosive Piers Morgan Debate | WATCH

In a blistering showdown on Piers Morgan Uncensored yesterday, former Canadian MP Goldie Ghamari, an Iranian-born advocate for regime change in Tehran, utterly eviscerated progressive commentator Cenk Uygur, exposing his ignorance and pro-regime biases in a debate over Iran's ongoing revolution. Ghamari, who fled the Islamic Republic's tyranny, delivered a masterclass in facts and passion, leaving Uygur stammering, interrupting, and resorting to conspiracy theories about "Israeli bots" to defend his flawed narrative.

The debate centered on the escalating protests in Iran, where millions are rising against the Ayatollah's brutal theocracy, demanding a return to the pre-1979 constitutional monarchy under the exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi. Ghamari, speaking from personal experience and deep connections to the Iranian diaspora, passionately argued that the people of Iran trust only Pahlavi to lead a transition from dictatorship to democracy. "There is only one person that we Iranians trust to transition us from a dictatorship to a democracy, and that is His Royal Highness," she declared, slamming Uygur's dismissal of the movement as manufactured propaganda.

Uygur, host of The Young Turks and a self-proclaimed expert on Middle Eastern affairs, crumbled under the pressure. He repeatedly interrupted Ghamari, attempting to lecture her on Farsi and Iranian historym despite being Turkish-born and having no direct ties to the country. His claims that pro-monarchy voices are mostly "fake Israeli bots" funded to provoke war were swiftly debunked by Ghamari, who called out his "jihadi Islamist propaganda" and accused him of whitewashing the regime's atrocities. Viewers described Uygur as "twitching" and "frustrated," with one observer noting he looked like a "sadistic, evil monster" desperately clinging to outdated talking points.

Critics piled on, highlighting Uygur's troubling history. For years, he denied the Armenian Genocide, a stance that undermines his credibility on human rights issues in the region. His network has faced accusations of receiving funding from Qatar, a state known for supporting Islamist groups, which may explain his reluctance to fully condemn Tehran's terror-sponsoring mullahs.

As one commentator put it, Uygur is "a hater of humanity" who runs cover for a "theocratic death cult," dismissing the Iranian people's suffering as a Zionist psyop while ignoring the "glory of the Pahlavi era" compared to the "squalor of the Ayatollahs."

Ghamari didn't hold back, warning regime apologists like Uygur: "Your pinky will be the biggest piece of you" if the Iranian people get their hands on them—a stark reminder of the regime's impending collapse. She emphasized that no "nation-building" is needed; simple support like disrupting IRGC communications and arming protesters could topple the tyrants without foreign boots on the ground.

Social media erupted in praise for Ghamari's "fearless" performance, with users calling her "brilliant" and declaring that she "handed [Uygur's] ass to him" while giving a much-needed history lesson.

Uygur's attempts to portray himself as "America First" fell flat, as he advocated yelling support "from a safe distance" while ignoring the regime's genocide against Kurds, Persians, and others, exposing his selective outrage, especially when it comes to anti-Israel stances.

This debate underscores a broader truth: Apologists like Uygur, who prioritize ideological grudges over human freedom, are out of touch with the Iranian street. As protests intensify, the world watches Iran's fight for liberty, one that Ghamari champions and Uygur undermines.