Skip to main content

Serious security breach

UNMASKED: The Attorney who Posed as IDF Captain, Snuck Into War Rooms and Recorded Secret Conversations

The Supreme Court reveals Asaf Shmulevitz as the imposter who infiltrated IDF HQ. The attorney allegedly leaked sensitive recordings from deep inside the war room.

Photo: IDF Spokesperson
Photo: IDF Spokesperson

In a stunning security breach, Asaf Shmulevitz, a practicing attorney, managed to impersonate an IDF captain and infiltrate military command centers during the early days of the war, where he recorded classified conversations and passed information to people who had no clearance to receive it.

Supreme Court Justice Gila Canfi-Steinitz shot down Shmulevitz's appeal to keep his identity hidden, upholding the Beersheba District Court's original decision to publicly name him.

Shmulevitz is being defended by former Deputy Chief Military Defense Attorney (Lt. Col. res.) Efrat Nachmani-Bar and Attorney Noam Weiner.

Ready for more?

The case raises serious questions about IDF security, especially during wartime. How did a civilian manage to pretend to be an officer and walk into sensitive facilities? Were there gaps in identity checks? And how much damage could the leaked information cause? These questions still don't have clear answers.

According to what's been allowed for publication, Shmulevitz successfully posed as a captain and got into several military situation rooms right after Operation Swords of Iron began. While there, he recorded secret conversations, gathered sensitive information, and sent it to people who weren't authorized to have it. The exact details of what was leaked and who received it haven't been fully revealed yet.

During the Supreme Court hearing, prosecutors asked to keep the ranks of senior officers involved in the case confidential, including major generals and a general. The request alone shows just how sensitive this case is and how high up the chain it goes.

Justice Canfi-Steinitz rejected the defense's attempt to keep Shmulevitz's name out of the public eye, deciding that people have a right to know about this breach, which outweighs his privacy concerns.

Court documents show that Shmulevitz "recruited himself" without getting an official Order 8, the proper authorization. This has sparked a heated dispute between prosecutors and the defense about what actually happened.

Shmulevitz insists he wasn't sneaking around. He says he reported to a brigade after being invited by an officer, just like thousands of other reservists did during those first chaotic days of the war. He claims he used his real name, went through security clearance, and got official approval to serve. His lawyers are crying foul, pointing out that other soldiers were approved after the fact using the exact same process.

Prosecutors tell a different story, one of calculated deception. They say Shmulevitz took advantage of the confusion in the Southern Command and lied his way into getting appointment letters from a senior officer. The legal fight now centers on whether his military background was real or completely made up to trick his way into classified areas.

One particularly sensitive part of the case involves charges of leaking classified information. While prosecutors admit the information didn't reach Israel's enemies, they say Shmulevitz shared sensitive details with unauthorized people, including a former pilot and officers in classified units, through WhatsApp. Shmulevitz has pushed back, claiming some of the information was already public on the IDF website, and in other cases, the person he was talking to actually gave him the information first.

This case is just the latest in a string of impersonation scandals exposed recently, including someone who pretended to be a British admiral at a memorial ceremony and the discovery of thousands of fake accounts on X.

More details are expected as the trial moves forward.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.

Enjoyed this article?

Yes (40)
No (2)
Follow Us:

Loading comments...