Why the Catholic Church Fights Judaism
How the rejection of the 1962 reforms is less an act of piety and more a reclamation of the Church's most potent political weapon.

Because Jesus is dead, Catholics believe that the only way to draw near to him is by consuming his blood through the Eucharist. However, this ritual alone is insufficient. To undergo a complete "Christological experience," they require a focal point where they must transform themselves into victims of the Jews, mirroring the sacrifice of Jesus himself.
Yet, a demographic problem arises: how can 3 billion Christians be the victims of a mere 14 million Jews?
The only way to bridge this gap is for the Catholic elites to claim that the Jews plot sinisterly, not only against the Church as an institution, but against its followers, specifically the most vulnerable among them.
This was the situation structurally within the Catholic world until 1962, when the church adopted a series of desicions that started the rehabilitation of its attitude towards the Jews and their fatih.
Historically, the Church has always subjugated the vast majority of the Christian population, using the "Jewish enemy" as a tool to silence dissent and justify the oppression of its own.
The Church never truly loved the Christian peasantry it enslaved, just as it never loved Muslims. However, as long as these populations were willing to remain in their designated place within the social or global hierarchy in exchange for being framed as victims of the Jews, the Catholic elite remained ready to collaborate with them.
In America, unlike in Europe, where Catholics historically lacked dominant control and were often a minority themselves, it was difficult for them to victimize the Jews, for it was against the American tradition, carried little merit or popularity, and was not feasible anyways.
Now, however, there is an ascending trend of neo-catholic traditionalism, that uses its attempt to override the 1962 desicions, and the traditional anti Judaism stance which the church has until 1962, not only to mark a restoration, but to use antisemitism represents an attempt to reconstruct American sociology and class structure.
This is not being done according to a secular Marxist dialectic (which they, of course, identify as "Jewish"), but according to the old pre 1962, Catholic paradigm. Within this phenomenon, the Jew is utilized as a "third organism" through which the struggle to achieve christhoood is again moved away from the sacraments and into the realm of the Jew as the object to struggle against, as a necessity for a reconfigured new hierarchy.
It's a power grab. Which blames the Jews for having too much power to gain the power, given that the church is the only one who can explain the Jews and while at there offer salvation from the Jews being explained.
This also covers the problem of having 14 million Jews in the world, and the need for those who are pushing this restoration to show that 2 billion Catholics are actually their victims.
In this system, they are always the absolute victims of the eternally conspiring Jew. Without this dynamic, the Church could not justify its power to suppress the masses, intellectually and theologically, because without an enemy, there is no justification for such totalizing control. They are simply protecting the world from the Jews, not only by exposing, but by marginalizing and identifying them as the enemy. Which is where anti semetism becomes a political tool for the church.
Twhy people hate the 1962 desicions. Because once they took antisemtism from the arsenal of tools, they basically took the basic political tool of the church away from itself. Cause the church lost political power since 17th century.
Now once they give away the force of theological political rheortical power of the church to be strong which is rooter in the friend enemy distinction it has towards the Jews, it gave up all. Hence those who wish to restore the political power of the church globally. And especially in America, are going in this path.
This brings us back to the conflict between the "Continental Left" and the "Continental Right." The Left, following a secular Marxist path, adopts only the structural forms of Catholic hierarchy and totality. Meanwhile, the Right, disillusioned with modernity, calls for either an ancient form of tradition—Catholicism—or a form of nationalism in which the State becomes the Church.
For both seekers of totality, the struggle begins with the "ancestral father" of religion: whether it is the Jew who created God (a perspective found in the roots of Nazism and Communism) or the Jew who killed and continues to sabotage Him.