Why the U.S.-Israel Strike on Iran is Breaking the Global Antisemite's Brain

The cooperation between Israel and the United States is functioning superbly.

The U.S. took out the nuclear facilities; the Israelis took out Khamenei.

Intelligence is synchronized. 

The proof of this success? 

Antisemites from both the Right and the Left are losing their minds.

As every Israeli middle-schooler knows, the success of the Jew in the era of equal rights and Emancipation has always driven nations to madness. Jews add quality and power to states; they are worth collaborating with. The negative elements within them exist, but they exist in every population group.

With the Jews, however, it is not a matter of "positive" or "negative" elements as found in any other group, but rather a completely different architecture altogether. It is this architecture that we shall now explain, and it is exactly what is currently driving Tucker Carlson to distraction.

Carlson is not fuming over the struggle against Iran’s terror regime itself; rather, he is fuming over the need to explain why this successful cooperation is based on:Jewish exploitation and manipulation. Or, that it is simply not that significant or high-quality.

The dilemma is this: If the Jews exploit others with such staggering success, how can they be anything but high-quality? And if they are high-quality, what is wrong with collaborating with them? (The answer provided is that they are a selfish entity whose very excellence is tied to a desire to serve only themselves).

This explains the rhetoric of many Neo-Catholics online today who claim: "I would rather die than kneel to Israel." They are, of course, in no mortal danger for failing to support Israel. Rather, the statement expresses a somewhat "victimhood" stance, asserting that even if the Jews are high-quality or powerful, I would rather perish than assist the ruling forces whose success is designed to empower themselves at the expense of others.

The claim underlying this (absurd) oath is the return of the myth: that the Jew, even if high-quality, is fundamentally incapable of true intimacy with his friends. He will always seek to liquidate that intimacy in favor of his "pound of flesh."Regardless, today’s reality forces the antisemite to recognize that the Jews possess a qualitative advantage, and even an intimacy with the U.S.

This advantage, in turn, forces the antisemite to acknowledge that perhaps there is a blessing in this nation, one that successfully generates intimacy with the Pentagon, and perhaps even justice in the theology of Jewish "Chosenness," a theology the Neo-Catholic and the some Lutheran will do anything to escape.

Here, the Talmudic argument regarding the Romans is adopted as a foundational characterization of the Jews in the eyes of their multiplying enemies on both the Right and the Left: "All this 'good' was done for selfish motives." 

The "good" itself is what exposes the nature of Israel and the Jews. Furthermore, because the Jews possess the power to establish the myths of "good and evil" as the People of the Book, many will ask: Why should we judge ourselves by a Jewish standard to begin with? 

But since most Americans are Christians and believers, those who reject the Jewish standard from the outset (namely pagans, neo-Nazis, radical Democrats, and extremist Muslims) have no choice but to voice the claims that "this only serves Israel" or "it only serves Netanyahu."

Thus, cooperation with Jews is framed as nothing more than the exploitation of the partner’s innocence to achieve Jewish goals.

The hint is blatant and overt: Israel is deceiving and exploiting America.From here, another floor is built into the argument: even if an action was not taken to realize Jewish goals alone, and even if the action was positive, anything that raises the horn of Jewish advantage or quality, even if it ultimately serves America and is "good", was either born in the sin of "plots and intrigues" the moment Israel was involved, or will eventually be realized once the fruits are harvested only to serve Zion - even if we do not know exactly how yet (“Greater Israel Myth).

Where in the history of Western thought does this complex and evasive move deflective originate? Indeed, from Old Lutheran and Old Catholic theology, but not only there.

A clue can be found in the fact that we hear the story of "exploiting the other" (as the purpose of Jewish action) and "plots and intrigues" (as the intent of Jewish action) when the Jews succeed and demonstrate quality and friendship toward a common national enemy in modern times as well. But when the Jews fail, are isolated, or are attacked?

Then, the supposed Jewish quality, because its motives are "clear" and more obvious than the quality itself, and because it surely led the Jews to exploit and harm others (for "the end of the act is in the initial motive"), explains the attack on them and the need to isolate them as a "just response."

[Intent + Success = Manipulation]

[Intent + Failure = Just Punishment]

The attacker of Jews is then declared a "Second Spartacus," the leader of a justified slave revolt responding to the qualitative intrigue that sits at the root of Jewish intent and the purpose of their action. 

This thought process stems from the fact that Jewish existence shifts and conjures according to the "judgment of the other," existing within a staggering standard that transcends the actual deeds and intentions of the subject.

This dimension is identified in Gnostic thought as the "Demiurgic" dimension.Herein lies the efficiency and elegance of both classical and modern antisemitism. They are not merely proven, non-violent methods (usually toward the Gentiles) for generating political consolidation and a politico-theological myth among non-Jewish populations in every era and locale. 

Rather, their strength, regardless of political consequences, as a circular thought system with "predictive" power and social-order-creating capacity, lies in the ability to attribute intent and action not just to the Jews, but to the practical and conceptual "root" they express and represent in the entire world.

Through them, one can isolate, brand, and explain evil - the Demiurge.How so?Like the original Demiurge, the creator of the material world in Gnostic thought (Christian, Neo-Platonic, and Muslim), so too the Jew.

Once labeled in other monotheistic theologies as "evil-seeking," and once that theology transformed into sociology and history, the Jew became a factor acting outside and above the material dilemmas of the general population.

Whether in his material success or his moral failure, he was identified through material success and theological failure precisely with the Demiurge: that entity which defines the material world and undermines the world of spirit and choice, aiming to exploit what exists in the actual world merely to elevate his own distorted spirituality, like a vampire sucking from the material world he built, preying upon the "children of spirit", for that is his nature as the creator of matter.

The Jew does not merely disrupt the material world; he engineers the system that imprisons the spirit within it.

In biological, theological, and political antisemitism, this "begging of the question" allows his actions to be explained whether he fails or succeeds by external standards.

If he succeeds, it is "no feat," because he created the standards himself through his Christ-denying, prophet-denying, fallen spiritual teachings.

If he fails, it is "no wonder," for he is the Demiurge destined to divert light from darkness and spirit from matter, by design.

Therefore, Hamas, Iran, Nazi Germany, Yale - it does not matter. Both at the level of intent and at the level of action, the manipulation generated through him (whether he currently appears weak and "pretending," or strong and "exploiting") is so ontically absolute that reality is only partial in its light when He is.

All one can recognize in the dimmed reality that is created are his manipulations; thus, a labyrinth can be built within reality solely through him. To reach a "clean" reality, one must first label the Jew and acknowledge this, and then "purify" the cultural, political, and religious field of his influence.

Only then can one transcend his "creative and lethal virtue", which exists not only beyond the distorted monotheistic myth itself (being the creator of the God-idea, if we are materialists) but as it is manifested within monotheistic sociology (Some Christian and Muslim societies, whose "truths" the Jew ostensibly denies).

The 2,000 year old attempt, From Marcion To Marx, to turn antisemitism into a Gnostic project is simply the surest way to guarantee "castration of the father" or "patricide" based on a competing theological or sociological variable, and the belief of “fantastic results” that shall be produced by that attempt at gaining political and mythical capital using the population’s suspicion and bias.

It creates a narrative where the enemy is the "evil creator of the material world", which is, in fact, "Evil Monotheism", against which Ancient "Good Monotheism", just as much as Modern “Healthy Materialism” can finally be recognized.

The political goal is to achieve the clarification, exposure, and simplification of the Jew on one hand, while understanding the world through him on the other.He becomes the explanatory object for all external phenomena related to a lack of "holism".

From here, combined with the scholarly success of the Jews, arise the thoughts that this "lack of holism" and the uncontrollable "externality" (which the Demiurge manages) manifests in the fact that Jews control the wallets (banks), the swords (wars), and the minds (media).

Thus, antisemitism is not only a consolidatory power on a political-theological-economic level; it also possesses significant explanatory power for the theological and material failures of other religions or nations.

Through the Jew, one can explain everything that is not clear in the material world the Jew created and from which one must be liberated.In light of this, we are compelled to identify the "Jewish attempt" to pollute the decent and good order of reality, which, on one hand, the Jew creates, and on the other, he corrupts.This is done by exposing his conspiratorial and scheming nature, the "Object of Guilt" that navigates and arranges external standards themselves, especially in the realm of morality.

There is also a Hegelian element here introduced in the 19th century. Which I have written about elsewhere.Hegel argued that the Jewish soul exists in a "prison," but in practice, he sought to explain how Jewish Law is what "imprisons" the Jew.

This extends to the particularistic, non-universal Jewish ethics he criticized, which many of his students viewed as exclusionary and unethical, and which "only he who understands it, understands the world" and is capable of redeeming it toward holism. 

That modern "redemption from the Jew" would be realized in the decades following Hegel by Marx and Hitler, another pair of famous Gnostics. In this way, intrigue, "flawed planning," and scheming-as-guilt, as in all Gnostic hatred, require the identification of the enemy's intent and never the proof of action.

It fixes the Jew as a Metaphysical Object.This is the rare quality of antisemitism as the most successful Gnostic hatred of all: directed against the creator of the theological myth, the spreader of the material myth, the engineer of the moral myth, who does so for his own purposes at the expense of others (like the war with Iran, no?).

This hatred can be used whenever there is a gap between intent and action in reality, even non-Jewish reality. Hence why we get the phenomena of institutionalized anti-semetism in countries that have little to no Jews alive (Poland, Mexico, Malaysia, Pakistan, Algeria just to name a few).

Even when the act of the actual Jew is ostensibly "good," and even when it is "bad," he is "beyond good and evil."

Therefore, his appearance is always a "monster show." For even if the actual Jew is murdered as an "act," he is guilty in the "intent" he birthed in his neighbor, for his murder is a struggle against the unfolding path of the realized Demiurge.

When the Jew kills as an "act," he is also guilty in "intent," as it expresses his Demiurgic nature.His negative nature in the world of intentions births negative reactions to all his actions. His actions follow his intent. But not all his intentions are directly clear from his actions, even if we have already created an explanatory loop for both…

This is perhaps what Yoav Ashkenazi refers to when he speaks of the Jew as the "non-human."

The Jew serves as an object of critique possessed of an independent omnipotence in the ability to predict his activity, due in no small part to his negative branding in Muslim, Catholic, and Lutheran theology that has trickled into modern culture. 

Through this, multidimensional Demiurge-ness connects, even in the secular era, to other multidimensional iterations in which the Jew exists as an image, allowing for more layers of complexity over time:- He is a multidimensional creature.- Who maintains a multidimensional, exclusionary theological myth.- Which receives a multidimensional modern interpretation regarding the myth he created, his own activity, and the connection between them, regardless of his actual deeds.

It is not for nothing that Historicism in its right-wing and left-wing shades, as well as Lutheranism, Catholicism, and both branches of Islam, celebrate his "octopoid" multidimensionality.

And it is not for nothing that they are all "mad" with Gnosticism.Here we can see in social reality the foundation of what historian Shmuel Ettinger identified as the "stereotype" that activates and stands at the base of antisemitism as a sociological phenomenon.

The stereotype binds the Jew to the "non-human’, to the Demiurge.The "non-human," unlike the Planning God, possesses that eternal "scheming" which found for itself a deterministic biological currency in Hitler. 

Hitler finally unified deed and intent without the need to solve riddles about multidimensionality and without the need to "suffer" the Jew in either intent or action.

The "evil" of the schemer lies in his attempt to ascend and rebel against the natural creation of the unified world of spirit and matter. 

Just as the Demiurge does this, so does the Jew. It is not just that the gap between intent and action is never clear in the one who plots; it is not just that he disguises himself as God; it is that he attempts to deny Creation itself.

And precisely the Jews, who hold the intellectual "deed" (Kushan) to Ex Nihilo creation, are the ones who, the moment they faded into the Demiurge, were identified with the very idea they were the first to defeat. There is an intellectual injustice in this.

Biological antisemitism should be viewed, as analyzed by Boaz Neumann, not only as an attempt to "purify the space" as a holistic eco-environmental project, but as the natural result of a final and systematic locking of the loop between intent and deed. 

At its core is the negation of Judaism at historical crossroads, post and pre-Emancipation, regarding Jewish nature. This existed even before the biological era through Demiurgic intrigue, and was finally framed as part of an entire ecological system in which there is no longer a need to wonder about the value of the Jew’s deeds or the quality of his intent. 

Instead, one can transcend the "Creator of Darkness" to finally imprison and destroy the Demiurge, by nullifying the split between spirit and matter that he allegedly created, and fighting him through the "Absolute Material" world (German) against the "Absolute Spiritual" world (Jewish).

This is also the place to speak of the theme of "Disguise" (Histavut), which Ashkenazi also notes. The Jew as one who disguises himself, another Gnostic, liturgical, and biblical element that makes present the "unfairness" that must be neutralized.Ashkenazi argues: "The image is of the pseudo-human who seeks to pollute the human with sin, evil, disease, and moral degradation, by disguising himself as human."

There is no other way to explain this "pseudo-humanity" except through "non-humanity." and there is no way to explain this non-humanity, alongside the control of wallets and swords, except as a Demiurgic element, as fixed in the Gnostic and Neo-Platonic traditions.This, in case you wondered, is what we are seeing with Tucker Carlson and Roger Waters.