The pattern repeats itself every election: new parties on the right and in the chareidi world promise a fresh start and an end to "the corrupt old guard," but their place in the next Knesset is anything but guaranteed.
Israeli electoral history is littered with parties that vowed to be "the surprise of the election" and bring in six to eight seats at minimum. Despite the euphoria and the momentum they claimed to feel on the ground, the results were brutal — and costly for the entire bloc. Here is that history, in the hope that the lesson will be learned.
1992 elections: the right's bonfire
The 1992 elections to the 13th Knesset saw one of the largest vote hemorrhages in the history of the national camp. The threshold was raised that year from 1% to 1.5%, and the right-wing bloc lost tens of thousands of votes to multiple lists that failed to cross it. The lost votes handed Yitzhak Rabin's left-wing bloc the margin it needed to form the government that led to the Oslo Accords.
The parties that crashed:
Techiya: Founded in the late 1970s in protest against the Camp David Accords and the evacuation of the Yamit region, the party brought together prominent ideological right-wing figures, Geula Cohen, Yuval Ne'eman, Elyakim Haetzni and Chanan Porat, and was an influential force in Likud-led governments. Heading into 1992, it was seen as the uncompromising voice of the national camp in the face of the Madrid Conference.
The party presented itself as the only ideological anchor that could prevent Netanyahu and Shamir from withdrawing from territory. Polls predicted a stable Knesset presence, but the result at the ballot box was a crash: just 31,957 votes (1.2%), and the party did not cross the 1.5% threshold.
Torah VeHa'aretz (Rabbi Moshe Levinger): Founded by Rabbi Moshe Levinger, one of the leaders of Gush Emunim and a key figure in renewing Jewish settlement in Chevron, the party argued that Techiya was not sufficiently Torah-based or hardline in its positions.
The list presented a Torah-current platform calling for full sovereignty over all of Eretz Yisrael, massive settlement expansion, and uncompromising war on terror without bowing to international pressure, particularly after the Madrid Conference.
The campaign headquarters was based mainly on field activity in Yehudah and Shomron, in hesder yeshivos and yeshivos of the ideological stream. The idea was to gather the votes of "chardal" (chareidi-leumi) voters looking for strong spiritual leadership.
When the moment of truth came, the Torah-nationalist public preferred to stick with established parties — the National Religious Party under Zevulun Hammer or Moledet under Rechavam Ze'evi. The party received just 3,708 votes (0.14%).
Geulat Yisrael (Rabbi Eliezer Mizrachi): Rabbi Eliezer Mizrachi, a former MK for Chabad and Agudas Yisrael, became famous when he refused to support the "stinking maneuver" in 1990, thereby preventing the formation of a left-wing government under Shimon Peres. Heading into 1992, he founded an independent chareidi-nationalist list.
His campaign was based on his image as "the savior of the right" from 1990 and on a unique chareidi-nationalist message: absolute loyalty to the integrity of the Land based on halachic rulings and the Lubavitcher Rebbe's directives, alongside concern for the needs of the chareidi and religious public. Mizrachi promised to be "the balancing factor" that would prevent any future political compromise.
In practice, the party won 12,851 votes (0.5%), an impressive number for a one-man list, but far from the threshold of around 39,000 votes. Most Chabad chassidim and the chareidi public ultimately preferred to vote for the official chareidi parties (United Torah Judaism or Shas) or for right-wing parties like Tzomet and Moledet.













