Why Tucker Loves Islam

We see here the yearning of figures like Tucker Carlson or Noam Chomsky for Islam.

As bi-polar authoritarian-anarchists, they seek a return to a tribal framework (Anarchy/the gang) in order to transform align themselves with a framework based on the rule of an elite (Authoritarian).

Yet, they weaponize being "for the people" to manufacture legitimacy for a post-lockean anti-republican structure they envision, hoping to inherit these frameworks in their own countries, after giving them global legitimation, even at the expense of their own country.

In America, without a strong Republican classical-liberal center, the tribal call from both wings which starts in media and academic "gangs", will infect the core power structure, turning gang mentality into Congressional politics.  

To create a shift from Democratic-Olygarchy or a Republic, into authoritarianism, via media and academia, one needs an efficient tool that media and academia can use in order to penetrate the republican political structure.

Antisemitism is the most efficient distraction for this process: It allows the tribalization needed for schism in culture and society, which will eventually penetrate the realm of the political.

How? by naming the "Jew" as a secret gang leader of the current democratic order - the distracter can not only create a gang-identity for themselves to infiltrate the mainstream. But also build the justification for building this gang and adopting the gang "Friend - Enemy" Karl Schmidt philosophy - because of that very Jew. Yes, it's circular.. but it does have theological and stereotypical roots, and it is actually from a functional perspective, also very elegant for consolidation or radicalization purposes.

To go deeper: if there is no actual "Second Coming" to celebrate right here and now, and the world remains "crooked," we are allowed to battle the republican-judaic notion of a sane government mandated by ethics or elected representitves. But since there is no Second Coming apparent, or the workers are still exploited, or america is used by jews, for now - given our negative perception of the world, and our lack of raw political power - we can at least rejoice in hating whoever is blamed for the crookedness we speak of, in order to create the conditions and consciousness for the future tribal-authoritarianism.

The political elegance of antisemitism lies in its mimetic infection: it projects a conspiratorial "gang" structure onto the Jew, only to adopt that very same tribal, anti-republican consciousness as its own weapon. It does not merely observe a conspiracy; it builds a conspiracy to fight a ghost, effectively turning the anti-semite into the very "clannish" entity they claim to despise.

The logic is simple: The world is bad. The Jews rule the world. If we clean the world of Jews, it will be good.

But the Jew is just an object of any otherness...

Saul Friedländer was wrong; Nazi antisemitism was not merely "redemptive."

Antisemitism as a concept is a messianic idea to redeem oneself of otherness. It promises salvation through the destruction of a scapegoat, allowing the "media gangs" and "academic gangs" to claim primacy in their fedual tribal architecture.

That is why Tucker loves Islam, because it satisfies his own messianic dream of ending the Jews. Meanwhile, ending the jews is crucial for a post-republican world, - a world which he envisions, in which his elitist authoritarian fantasies can come to life, following the anarchy he tried to cause, so that perhaps he can rule without any jewish moral restraints.