Loyalty to Daas Torah and Two Contrasting Models at the Top
Within Degel HaTorah's political structure, Maklev was identified above all as the faithful emissary and confidant of the generation's leaders. The national turning point came with the direct instruction of Maran Hagaon Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv zt"l, who appointed him as Knesset representative in 2008.
Maklev served as a quiet, close communication channel between the mission of daas Torah and centers of governmental power, and throughout his path continued to operate under the guidance of gedolei hador—Maran Hagra"l Shteinman, Maran Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, and Maran Hagry"g Edelstein zt"l.
This commitment to halacha and gedolei Yisrael always combined in him with a practical, statesmanlike approach that won the hearts of officials and Knesset members across the political spectrum.
To understand Maklev's operation in depth, one must examine the fascinating partnership he conducted for nearly two decades alongside MK Moshe Gafni.
Both represented Degel HaTorah together, but their styles were utterly different—two contrasting models of haredi public service:
Moshe Gafni—the loud voice, the fighter, the leader: Gafni is a dominant, vocal, central figure. He led the faction for many years, chaired the Finance Committee, and is considered the "face" of Degel HaTorah vis-à-vis the media and coalition. His style was characterized by high visibility, controlled aggression, frontline political leadership, and the ability to lead determined public struggles. Gafni is the type of leader at the spearhead.
Uri Maklev—the quiet worker, the professional, accessible to the public: Maklev chose a model almost completely opposite to Gafni's demonstrative, fiery style. He was characterized by exemplary quiet, topping attendance tables in the plenum and committees, and a technocratic-statesmanlike approach. He focused on professional committees (public petitions, science and technology), detailed legislation, and solving bureaucratic problems.
Maklev is the type of emissary who works in the field and corridors. Many people turned to him for everyday matters like long queues and delays in various offices or in the realm of public transportation.
This division of labor created a well-oiled machine: Gafni supplied the loud voice, the public struggle, and faction leadership, while Maklev supplied the day-to-day parliamentary work, municipal knowledge, and the ability to advance complex issues without noise.