Skip to main content

Preparing for Round 2?

America's Secret Weapon Against Iran Isn't One Missile. It's Ten Thousand.

How America is rethinking the economics of air power - with Iran in mind

US sailors
US sailors (Photo: US Army)

The Pentagon has quietly signed one of the most consequential weapons procurement deals in recent memory. Framework agreements with four leading defense companies will see the United States acquire more than 10,000 low-cost cruise missiles over three years beginning in 2027, under a program formally known as LCCMP, the Low-Cost Cruise Missile Program. Trial missile purchases from the winning companies are expected to begin as early as next month.

The price tag per unit tells the story. A standard JASSM-ER cruise missile, long the backbone of American precision strike capability, costs roughly one million dollars each. The new missiles under LCCMP are expected to come in at less than half that. Multiply the savings across tens of thousands of units, and the strategic logic becomes clear: the Pentagon is no longer optimizing for the perfect weapon. It's optimizing for scale.

A 188% Budget Surge

The numbers behind this shift are striking. The US military's 2027 missile procurement budget request has surged 188 percent compared to prior years, a figure that reflects a fundamental reassessment inside the Pentagon about what the next major conflict will actually demand. Precision will still matter, but volume will matter more. The US Air Force is separately planning to purchase nearly 28,000 low-cost cruise missiles over the next five years under a related program called FAMM, underscoring just how thoroughly the doctrine of mass firepower has taken hold.

The Companies Leading the Charge

Ready for more?

Two names stand out. Anduril, the tech-forward defense startup that has rapidly become one of the Pentagon's most favored partners, will supply at least 1,000 "Barracuda" stealth cruise missiles annually, weapons designed to penetrate defended airspace and strike strategic targets. Leidos will manufacture 3,000 missiles per year based on an upgraded AGM-190A platform, with significant improvements in maneuverability and accuracy.

Beyond these main contracts, the Pentagon has also struck a separate deal with startup Castelion for 500 hypersonic "Blackbeard" missiles annually. Flying at five times the speed of sound, hypersonic weapons represent the cutting edge of modern strike capability. The combination of high-volume conventional cruise missiles with hypersonic systems would create a layered attack architecture that existing air defense systems would struggle to counter simultaneously.

A New Way of Buying Weapons

Emil Michael, the Pentagon's Chief Technology Officer, has been explicit that this is a deliberate departure from the traditional defense acquisition model. Rather than years-long development cycles with cost overruns and delivery delays, the new commercial-style approach binds companies to strict timelines and fixed unit prices. The message to the defense industry, and to adversaries, is blunt: America is building a digital weapons stockpile, and it intends to build it fast.

The program also integrates advanced autonomous systems into the broader concept of operations. The Air Force is planning to field more than 150 autonomous drone wingmen alongside its F-35 stealth fleet, machines that will coordinate with the new missiles to complicate enemy targeting and defense calculations further.

Shifting the Balance Against Tehran

The backdrop to all of this is Iran. Where the US military was once constrained by the sheer cost and scarcity of precision munitions, able to sustain only a limited number of simultaneous strikes, the new arsenal would allow for massive, coordinated salvos capable of overwhelming any air defense network Iran currently fields or could plausibly develop. The strategic shift is deliberate: from surgical precision as the governing principle, to mass availability as the decisive advantage.

In short, the Pentagon is no longer asking how accurate a missile can be. It's asking how many it can build, how fast, and at what price. The answers it's arriving at are rewriting the arithmetic of deterrence.

Ready for more?

Join our newsletter to receive updates on new articles and exclusive content.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information.