It was billed as a simple interview. It turned into one of the most revealing conversations Benjamin Netanyahu has given in years.
Sitting down with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett for his first U.S. broadcast interview since the outbreak of the U.S.-Israel war against Iran, the Israeli prime minister delivered a cascade of headlines: the war isn't over, Iran's uranium must be physically seized, Israel should stop taking American money and, in a moment that stopped many observers in their tracks, he conceded for the first time that he bears some responsibility for the catastrophic failures of October 7, 2023.
The interview aired Sunday night on 60 Minutes, as the 11-week-old conflict continued to reverberate across the Middle East. This was Netanyahu at the center of history - and he knew it.
"You Go In, and You Take It Out"
The prime minister opened on the question the entire region is holding its breath over: is the war with Iran finished?
His answer was an unambiguous no.
Iran's highly enriched uranium, Netanyahu told Garrett, must be physically removed from the country. Its enrichment facilities must be dismantled. Its proxy armies, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, are still standing. Its ballistic missile program, while degraded, is still alive.
"Now, we've degraded a lot of it," he acknowledged. "But all of that is still there, and there is work to be done."
When Garrett pressed him on how Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium would actually be removed, Netanyahu didn't reach for diplomatic language. He reached for plain words: "You go in, and you take it out."
He added that a negotiated agreement would be the ideal path, walk in, remove the material, be done with it. But when Garrett pushed further, what if there's no agreement? Can force achieve it? Netanyahu answered fiercely, "You're gonna ask me these questions. I'm gonna dodge them. Because I'm not gonna talk about our military possibilities, plans, or anything of the kind."
What Really Happened in the White House Situation Room
Then came the Situation Room.
The New York Times had previously reported that on February 11th, in a fateful meeting before President Trump ordered strikes on Iran, Netanyahu made a "hard sell," pushing the idea that the Islamic Republic was ripe for regime change, and that a joint U.S.-Israeli mission could finally bring it down. It was the kind of report that, if true, would place Netanyahu at the very center of a decision to go to war.
Netanyahu pushed back, but carefully.
He didn't deny the meeting. He didn't deny the conversation. He disputed only the framing: that he had presented regime change as a guaranteed outcome. "It's incorrect in the sense that I said, 'Oh, well, it's guaranteed we can do it,'" he told Garrett. "I didn't say that."
What he did say, he confirmed, was this: "We both understood that we have little time to act, because otherwise they'll get nuclear weapons."
It was a partial denial that may have raised as many questions as it answered.








